Opportunities for Estate Planning

 

 

Home
Up

 

  

 

opportunities for estate planning

IN LIGHT OF

CURRENT FEDERAL ESTATE TAX LAW

 

     Under the 2001 law known as "EGTRRA," the federal estate and gift tax system has been in a state of short-term fluctuation and long-term uncertainty. As of January 1, 2010, the estate tax has finally been eliminated, but only for decedents dying in calendar year 2010. The same law calls for the estate tax to be reinstated, and at its 2001 levels, for deaths occurring after December 31, 2010.

    This article discusses the current rules governing the federal estate and gift tax, and the planning opportunities arising from them.

 

FEDERAL ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION FOR 2009 AND THE ONE-YEAR REPEAL OF THE TAX

bullet

For estates where death occurred in calendar year 2009, the federal estate tax will still be imposed, but with the availability of a $3.5 million exemption, i.e., only assets valued in excess of $3.5 million will be taxed.

bullet

The federal estate tax is eliminated for estates of decedents whose deaths occur during the 12-month period starting January 1, 2010 and ending on December 31, 2010. 

bullet

Some commentators believe that Congress may yet take action this year to reimpose the estate tax at its 2009 levels and make the tax retroactive to deaths occurring on or after January 1, 2010. However, the constitutionality of any attempted retroactive tax legislation is unclear, and would likely be tested in the courts.

 

Federal Estate Tax EXEMPTION TO REVERT BACK TO $1 MILLION for Deaths After December 31, 2010

bullet

Regardless of what rules may ultimately govern estates where death occurs in 2010, under the "sunset" provisions of the EGTRRA law, the federal estate tax will be fully reinstated, and the exemption amount will revert back to $1 million, for deaths occurring after December 31, 2010.  The maximum estate tax rate will increase to 55%.

 

bullet

Again, commentators predict that Congress will not allow this reversion to occur and will certainly "fix" the estate tax rules before 2011. However, they also predicted that Congress would never let the estate tax be repealed for one year in 2010. There is thus a good chance that, come January 1, 2011, the federal estate tax exemption will in fact be only $1 million.

 

NOTE ON Pennsylvania inheritance tax:  In any event, these changes in federal estate law will not affect the Pennsylvania inheritance tax, which will continue to be imposed on the transfer of taxable property at death (other than to the surviving spouse), at rates that are based on the relationship between the beneficiaries and the decedent.  There is no exemption amount applicable to the Pennsylvania inheritance tax.

 

Federal Gift Tax Exemption Is Fixed, and the Gift Tax Will Not Be Repealed

bullet

Unlike the federal estate tax exemption, which has risen over the past several years, the federal gift tax exemption has been fixed at $1 million and is due to remain at that level for all future years, with no repeal in 2010. Lifetime gifts in excess of the $1 million exemption amount (and the annual exclusion amount of $13,000 for 2009) will thus continue to be taxed.

bullet

The annual gift tax exclusion is indexed for inflation and could increase in future years.

 

Carryover Basis: The "Dark Side" of Estate Tax Repeal

bullet

For those estates where death occurs at a time when the federal estate tax is not in effect (e.g., during calendar year 2010), the inherited assets passing to the beneficiaries, while escaping the federal estate tax, will be subject to the carryover basis rules.  This will be a decidedly mixed blessing. 

By way of explanation, the term "basis" is used in the context of figuring taxable gains and losses on sales of capital assets (generally defined as any asset not used in a trade or business). "Carryover" basis means that the beneficiary of an inherited asset must use the decedent's own basis (usually the original cost of the asset) for each inherited asset to determine gain or loss when the beneficiary later sells the asset -- in other words, the decedent's basis is "carried over" to the beneficiary. 

Carryover basis rules will likely be very burdensome to administer, since in many cases it will be difficult if not impossible to ascertain the decedent's basis in the asset.

 

bullet

When the federal estate tax is in effect at the time of a decedent's death, there is a "step up" in basis, which means that the beneficiary can use the date-of-death value of an asset as his or her basis upon its later sale.  By that definition, any gain built up prior to death will go untaxed for capital gains tax purposes.

 

bullet

Carryover basis, at least in larger estates, will result in additional capital gains tax being paid by beneficiaries on the sale of inherited assets. 

 

EXAMPLE:  Aunt Mary dies in 2010 leaving her nephew Andy her 500 shares of ABC Corp. stock.  Aunt Mary had purchased this stock at $10.00 a share back in 1986, but at her death it was valued at $90.00 per share.  In 2012 Andy decides to sell the stock, which at that time is worth $110.00 per share.

Under the carryover basis rules, Andy will have a taxable gain of $100 per share (sales price of $110.00, reduced by Aunt Mary's basis of $10.00).  Had Aunt Mary died with the step-up in basis rules in effect, the taxable gain would only have been $20.00 per share (sales price of $110.00, reduced by the date-of-death value of $90.00).

Of course, in the "real world" perhaps the biggest problem for Andy will be to find out the actual price that Aunt Mary paid for the stock way back in 1986!

 

 

 

CURRENT ESTATE PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES

Given the uncertainties of the federal estate tax law for 2010 and beyond, what are the planning choices that married couples and individuals should now consider?

 

bullet

MARRIED COUPLES SHOULD CONSIDER UPDATING THEIR ESTATE PLANS that CONTAIN FORMULA BEQUESTS THAT ASSUME THE EXISTENCE OF A FEDERAL ESTATE TAX 

Some wills and trusts of married couples define the bequests passing to or for the benefit of the surviving spouse by a formula that is described in terms of the federal estate tax exemption (or unified credit) available in the year of death. Typically the documents call for an amount equal to the federal exemption to pass into a "credit shelter" trust, with any amount in excess of the exemption to pass either outright to the surviving spouse or into a separate QTIP trust for their benefit. 

However, if the first spouse dies at a time when there is no estate tax and thus no exemption, how will such bequests be construed? 

To avoid such uncertainty, these couples' wills could be updated in 2010 to clearly define the bequest to the surviving spouse in the event that there is no estate tax applicable at the first spouse's death.

 

bullet

PLAN FOR CONTINGENCY OF FLUCTUATING EXEMPTION AMOUNTS   

Looking towards 2011 and beyond, when the exemption amount may be as low as $1 million (if there is no Congressional action) or as high as $3.5 million, $5 million, or more (if there is), flexibility is the key principle of good drafting.  One such flexible solution is to have an initial "all to my spouse" bequest in each spouse's will, but then provide for a contingent "credit shelter" trust that the surviving spouse can fund by making a post-mortem disclaimer of all or a specific percentage or amount of the outright bequest.

With the disclaimer approach, the surviving spouse can choose exactly how much (if any) of the first spouse's  estate to place into the credit shelter trust in order to utilize some part or all of the first spouse's estate tax exemption. The surviving spouse would be the lifetime beneficiary of this trust.

 

bullet

Partial QTIP Trust  

As an alternative to the spousal disclaimer trust, marital deduction planning could involve the creation of a single trust for the surviving spouse’s benefit, again avoiding the traditional “bypass trust” approach. The executor could elect how much of the single trust to qualify as QTIP property for the marital deduction. This partial QTIP election would take into account both the first spouse’s exemption amount, if any, and the likelihood of permanent estate tax repeal or an increased estate tax exemption at the surviving spouse’s death.

 

bullet

Family Limited Partnerships and LLC

Even if there is permanent estate tax repeal, there will be good reasons, particularly with an active family business or family investments that are closely managed, to shift existing assets and future appreciation to younger family members while allowing the senior family members to retain control.

 

bullet

Lifetime Giving

Lifetime gifting should continue within the limits of the annual gift tax exclusion (currently $13,000) or the unlimited exclusion for tuition or medical expense payments.  

Donors who made large taxable gifts up to the maximum exemption amount allowed in prior years now possibly have additional amount to gift tax-free.

However, any gifts that could trigger a gift tax liability (i.e., total lifetime gifts in excess of the $1 million exemption) should be avoided.

 

 
bullet

Charitable Remainder Trusts

The charitable remainder trust (CRT) is primarily an income tax planning vehicle, permitting you to transfer appreciated property to a tax-exempt trust, which in turn sells the property and reinvests the proceeds and pays you an annuity or unitrust amount each year thereafter. The estate tax deduction for the remainder interest passing to the charity when the trust ends is usually a secondary consideration. Thus the CRT should continue to be a valuable estate planning tool.

 

 
bullet

Charitable Lead Trusts

A charitable lead trust (CLT), on the other hand, may not be as useful as the exemption amount increases, since the advantage of the CLT is primarily to reduce estate taxes. (In any event, no income tax deduction is available with the CLT.)

 

 
bullet

Charitable Private Foundation

The charitable private foundation is a vehicle that serves important income and gift tax purposes, so its use should continue under the new law.

 

 

bullet

Role of Life Insurance

Many clients will still need life insurance for purposes other than paying federal estate taxes. For example, life insurance will still be needed to fund business buy-sell agreements, to serve as an income replacement for dependents of a deceased family breadwinner, and as a means of leveraging annual exclusion gifts. These needs will not be reduced by estate tax repeal.

With the long delay and ultimate uncertainty of estate tax repeal, be careful about dropping or reducing existing life insurance coverage.

The irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) remains an important planning technique to exclude life insurance proceeds from the gross estate.

If you want to buy new policies, the use of term insurance (including decreasing term) should be considered.  (The utility of this kind of policy will depend on the age and health of the client.)

The policy should be convertible term, since permanent repeal of the estate tax is uncertain.

 

 

NON-TAX REASONS FOR ESTATE PLANNING

Even if the federal estate tax exemption amount is permanently increased to an amount that is well above the size of a couple's assets, there are still many non-tax reasons why you should have your estate plan periodically reviewed and updated. At a minimum, you need to have documents in place that adequately answer the following questions:

 

bullet

"What will happen if during my lifetime I become unable to take care of my own personal and health needs"?

 

bullet

"What will happen if during my lifetime I am no longer able to manage my property"?

 

bullet

"Who will receive my property at my death"?

 

bullet

"Who will wind up my affairs after my death"?

 

bullet

"How can I lower the state inheritance taxes that my family will have to pay"?

 

As to your intended beneficiaries, Congress obviously cannot legislate away problem areas such as spendthrift heirs, handicapped children, substance abuse, divorce, and immaturity.  Protecting beneficiaries in these situations will remain an important estate planning goal.

 

 

 

          

DISCLAIMER

Martin J. Hagan is licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This website is intended solely for informational use and is not intended to solicit clients. Likewise, any information contained in or obtained from this web site is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be used as legal advice.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER:   Pursuant to Treasury guidelines, any tax advice contained in this website (or any link from it) does not constitute a formal opinion. Accordingly, any tax advice contained in this website (or any link from it) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be asserted by the Internal Revenue Service. You should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Send mail to mhagan@haganlaw.net  with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2010  Martin J. Hagan, One Gateway Center - 8 South; Pittsburgh, PA 15222-1435
Last Updated: 03/05/10