Opportunities for Estate Planning

 

 

Home
Up

  

 

opportunities for estate planning IN

LIGHT OF CURRENT FEDERAL ESTATE TAX LAW

 

Since 2001 the federal estate tax system has been in a state of short-term fluctuation and long-term uncertainty, which has made planning very difficult.  A permanent solution regarding the  exemption amount and rate(s) of tax should be reached within the next few years, as 2011 (when the exemption amount is due to revert to $1 million) approaches.  This article discusses the current rules governing the federal estate tax.

 

TIMETABLE FOR INCREASES IN THE FEDERAL ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION AND TEMPORARY REPEAL OF THE TAX

There is currently a $2 million federal estate tax exemption for estates of decedents whose deaths occur in calendar years 2007 and 2008. 

The exemption will rise to $3.5 million for deaths occurring in calendar year 2009.

The federal estate tax is then due to be repealed altogether for estates where death occurs during the 12-month period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.

 

Federal Estate Tax EXEMPTION DUE TO REVERT BACK TO $1 MILLION for Deaths After December 31, 2010

Under the "sunset" provisions of the 2001 federal tax law known as EGTRRA, starting in 2011 the federal estate tax will be reinstated and the exemption will revert back to its 2001 amount of $1 million for deaths occurring after December 31, 2010.  The maximum estate tax rate will also return to its 2001 level of 55%.

While "conventional wisdom" says that a return to the pre-2002 estate tax rules will never be allowed to happen, there is certainly no guarantee of that result, especially in the absence of a political consensus on permanent estate tax repeal or, in the alternative, what an appropriate exemption amount should be.

 

NOTE ON Pennsylvania inheritance tax:  In any event, these changes in federal estate law will not affect the Pennsylvania inheritance tax, which will continue to be imposed on the transfer of taxable property at death, at rates based on the relationship between the beneficiaries and the decedent.

 

Federal Gift Tax Exemption Is Fixed and the Gift Tax Will Not Be Repealed

Unlike the rising exemption for federal estate taxes, the federal gift tax exemption has been fixed at $1 million and will remain at that level for all future years, with no eventual repeal.  Lifetime gifts in excess of the $1 million exemption amount (and the current $12,000 annual exclusion) will thus continue to be taxed.

The annual gift tax exclusion is currently $12,000 per donee, and is indexed for inflation.

 

Carryover Basis: The "Dark Side" of Estate Tax Repeal

If federal estate tax repeal would become permanent, carryover basis for inherited assets will also become part of the law.  This will be a decidedly mixed blessing. 

By way of explanation, the term "basis" is used in the context of figuring taxable gains and losses on sales of capital assets.  "Carryover" basis means that the beneficiary must use the decedent's own basis (usually the original cost of the asset) for each inherited asset to determine gain or loss when the beneficiary later sells the asset -- in other words, the decedent's basis is "carried over" to the beneficiary. 

With the estate tax, there is also a "step up" in basis, which means that the beneficiary can use the date of death value as his or her basis upon later sale.  Any gain built up prior to death essentially goes untaxed for capital gains tax purposes.

 

Carryover basis, at least in larger estates, will result in additional capital gains tax being paid by beneficiaries on the sale of inherited assets.  Moreover, the carryover basis rules will likely prove very difficult to administer.

 

EXAMPLE:  Aunt Mary dies in 2010 leaving her nephew Andy her 500 shares of ABC Corp. stock.  Aunt Mary had purchased this stock at $10.00 a share back in 1986, but at her death it was valued at $100.00 per share.  In 2012 Andy decides to sell the stock, which at that time is worth $110.00 per share.

Under the carryover basis rules, Andy will have a taxable gain of $100 per share (sales price of $110.00, reduced by Aunt Mary's basis of $10.00).  Had Aunt Mary died with the "step up in basis" rules in effect, the taxable gain would have been only $10.00 (sales price of $110.00, reduced by the date of death value of $100.00).

Of course, in the "real world" perhaps the biggest problem for Andy will be to find out the actual price that Aunt Mary had paid for the stock way back in 1986!

 

 

CURRENT ESTATE PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES

How have traditional estate planning techniques been affected by the increase in the federal estate tax exemption amount from $600,000, which had been the fixed exemption amount back in the 1990's, to $2 million and (in 2009) $3.5 million, and the possible repeal of the tax?

 

Preference for Disclaimer trust in Marital Deduction Planning  

Marital deduction planning for married couples whose combined assets still exceed the exemption threshold ($2.0 million in 2007-2008) will likely shift away from the "bypass trust" or "A-B trust" approach, which requires the full funding of a credit shelter trust up to the maximum exemption amount.  A more flexible solution is to have an initial "all to my spouse" bequest, but then provide a contingent credit shelter trust that the surviving spouse can fund by making a post-mortem disclaimer of all or a specific percentage or amount of the outright bequest.

With the disclaimer approach, the surviving spouse can choose exactly how much (if any) of the first spouse's  estate to place into the credit shelter trust in order to utilize some part or all of the first spouse's estate tax exemption. The surviving spouse would be the lifetime beneficiary of this trust.

 

Partial QTIP Trust  

As an alternative to the spousal disclaimer trust, marital deduction planning could involve the creation of a single trust for the surviving spouse’s benefit, again avoiding the traditional “bypass trust” approach. The executor could elect how much of the single trust to qualify as QTIP property for the marital deduction. This partial QTIP election would take into account both the first spouse’s exemption amount, and the likelihood of permanent estate tax repeal or an increased estate tax exemption at the surviving spouse’s death.

 

Family Limited Partnerships and LLC

Even if there is permanent estate tax repeal, there will be good reasons, particularly with an active family business or family investments that are closely managed, to shift existing assets and future appreciation to younger family members while allowing the senior family members to retain control.

To the extent valuation discounts can be created through lifetime gifts, families should continue using this strategy, given the unavoidable possibility of death occurring prior to 2010.

 

Lifetime Giving

Lifetime gifting should continue within the limits of the $12,000 annual gift tax exclusion (effective for gifts made in 2007) or the unlimited exclusion for tuition or medical expense payments.  

Donors who made large taxable gifts up to the maximum exemption amount allowed in prior years ($600,000 or $675,000) now possibly have additional amount to gift tax-free.

However, any gifts that could trigger a gift tax liability (i.e., total lifetime gifts in excess of the $1 million exemption) should be avoided.

 

Simplify Estate Plans If Your Assets Will Be At or Below the New Exemption Amounts

Estate plans can be simplified as necessary to eliminate tax-related  provisions that are deemed no longer needed in light of the increased estate tax exemption. (A thorough analysis of the your assets, including life insurance benefits and retirement accounts, will necessary to ensure that the total value of your assets does in fact fall below the exemption threshold.)

Joint lifetime revocable trusts for spouses will become  more attractive when the couple’s combined assets fall below the increased exemption amount.

 

Charitable Remainder Trusts

The charitable remainder trust (CRT) is primarily an income tax planning vehicle, permitting you to transfer appreciated property to a tax-exempt trust, which in turn sells the property and reinvests the proceeds and pays you an annuity or unitrust amount each year thereafter. The estate tax deduction for the remainder interest passing to the charity when the trust ends is usually a secondary consideration. Thus the CRT should continue to be a valuable estate planning tool.

 

Charitable Lead Trusts

A charitable lead trust (CLT), on the other hand, may not be as useful as the exemption amount increases, since the advantage of the CLT is primarily to reduce estate taxes. (In any event, no income tax deduction is available with the CLT.)

 

Charitable Private Foundation

The charitable private foundation is a vehicle that serves important income and gift tax purposes, so its use should continue under the new law.  

 

Role of Life Insurance

Many clients will still need life insurance for purposes other than paying federal estate taxes. For example, life insurance will still be needed to fund business buy-sell agreements, to serve as an income replacement for dependents of a deceased family breadwinner, and as a means of leveraging annual exclusion gifts. These needs will not be reduced by estate tax repeal.

With the long delay and ultimate uncertainty of estate tax repeal, be careful about dropping or reducing existing life insurance coverage.

The irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) remains an important planning technique to exclude life insurance proceeds from the gross estate.

If you want to buy new policies, the use of term insurance (including decreasing term) should be considered.  (The utility of this kind of policy will depend on the age and health of the client.)

The policy should be convertible term, since permanent repeal of the estate tax is uncertain.

 

 

 NON-TAX REASONS FOR ESTATE PLANNING

Even with the increased exemption amounts and possible permanent repeal of the federal estate tax, there are still many non-tax reasons why you should have your estate plan periodically reviewed and updated. At a minimum, you need to have documents in place that adequately answer the following questions:

 

"What will happen if during my lifetime I become unable to take care of my own personal and health needs"?

 

"What will happen if during my lifetime I am no longer able to manage my property"?

 

"Who will receive my property at my death"?

 

"Who will wind up my affairs after my death"?

 

"How can I lower the state inheritance taxes that my family will have to pay"?

 

As to your intended beneficiaries, Congress obviously cannot legislate away problem areas such as spendthrift heirs, handicapped children, substance abuse, divorce, and immaturity.  Protecting beneficiaries in these situations will remain an important estate planning goal.

 

          

DISCLAIMER

Martin J. Hagan is licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This website is intended solely for informational use and is not intended to solicit clients. Likewise, any information contained in or obtained from this web site is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be used as legal advice.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER:   Pursuant to Treasury guidelines, any tax advice contained in this website (or any link from it) does not constitute a formal opinion. Accordingly, any tax advice contained in this website (or any link from it) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be asserted by the Internal Revenue Service. You should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Send mail to mhagan@haganlaw.net  with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2007 Martin J. Hagan, One Gateway Center - 8 South; Pittsburgh, PA 15222-1435
Last Updated: 02/01/08